|
The Ohio State University
College of Mathematical & Physical Sciences
Department of Astronomy
|
MODS Team Progress Report
2000 November 14
Attendees: Pat Osmer, Darren DePoy, Bruce Atwood, Paul Byard,
Tom O'Brien, Jennifer Marshall, Jerry Mason, & Rick Pogge
Optics
The first part of this meeting was a "closed door" discussion of vendor
quotes for optics materials and fabrications.
Mechanical Design
Tom O'Brien gave a report on mechanical design progress to date. The
highlights are as follows:
- Mirror Support
- This generically includes support for the large reflective optics,
namely the gratings, camera primary, and collimatory mirrors. The
gratings will be solid zerodur, while the mirrors will be Hextex
honeycomb mirrors. A simple 3-point support will work. The Hextex
mirrors offer terrific stiffness/weight performance compared to solid
mirrors. In our discussions with Hextex, we have designed mounting
bosses in an optimum triangle, not at the edges. We can live with
what are at first-sight poor figures resulting from this support
scheme because the footprints for the different field locations are
small comared to the sizes of the mirrors. Thus each field location
is only subject to small "wedge" distortions, even though the overall
figure of the optic looks poor. The total distortion at the field
corners are very tiny when the gravity load is shifted from zenith
through horizon pointing - much smaller by at least an order of
magnitude than our best flexures specification.
We still don't have a good hard-point design, but this is in progress.
Overall the mirror support design is pretty far along.
- Camera Design
- The center section of the instrument is the structural cornerstone.
The camera mounting ties into the primary steel structure. The
basic design (figure online soon) is the camera primary and corrector
cells joined by invar struts. this makes it pretty well athermalized
for focus between the primary and detectors. Still needs to be some
work done on the point where the camera structure ties into the
detector module.
- Filter Wheel
- The filter wheel mounts in front of the detector/shutter system.
The design is almost done, and is fairly simple. The filter
positioning tolerance is less than before because there is no power
on the filters (recall that an earlier design had field-flattners
bonded to the filteres proper).
- Detector Dewar Vacuum Window
- The vacuum window for the detector dewar is a field-flattener. Pressure
loading and edge thickness look OK.
- Grating Tilt Mechanism
The guys in the shop are busy making the parts for the grating tilt
mechanism and other test systems. A prototype grating tilt system is
working in the lab, but Tom hasn't had much time to work with it. First
impressions are that it is looking very good.
SAC Meeting
Ohio State will host the LBT Science Advisory Committee (SAC), to
be held in the Astronomy Conference room in McPherson Lab on
Thursday, 2000 November 30 to Friday December 1. While a formal
agenda has not yet been sent by SAC chair Tom Herbst (Heidelberg),
we know that Darren will be presenting an update on MODS, there will
be some discussion of the upcoming MODS PDR, and we will be giving
SAC members a tour of our shop facilities.
Interested members of the MODS team and the Astronomy Department
are welcome to attend open sessions.
R. Pogge, 2000 November 20
[
Progress Reports |
MODS Project Page |
OSU LBT Page |
OSU Astronomy Home Page
]